Editor,
One of the best arguments against restricting the size of semi-automatic gun magazines is this...
Even the anti-gunners acknowledge that the Police should still be able to use high-capacity magazines.
SO... that is an admission that these devices ARE more effective and give them an advantage in a dangerous situation.
Now think about it...
A Police Officer likely has extra magazines on his belt, maybe he's wearing Kevlar bullet proof clothing, he likely has a rifle or a shotgun in his cruiser close by, maybe even a backup gun, and probably has a partner who is similarly armed and protected. If with all that, he still is better off with high capacity magazines... doesn't that send a powerful message?!
Now think of a citizen who is home in bed in the middle of the night and some violent hostile criminals kick down his door and burst into the house.
He is not going to have all the other backup equipment or protection that a cop and his partner have... he's on his own to defend himself and his family, alone!
How much more important, than the situation of the police referred to above, would it then be for him to have a high capacity magazine to protect his life?!
It obviously is much more critical for him to have this capability than the Police, who the 2nd Amendment destroyers admitted were better off with high-capacity magazines.
End of debate!
There is not even any question about it. And yet traitors like Feinstein & Schumer would willingly sell your Constitutionally protected right down the river out of pure ignorance and/or the desire for unlimited power over the people.
Well they're not going to get it... not ever!
We'll fight to the end, just like the Minutemen of Revolutionary America did to prevent ourselves from being disarmed!
Disarmed by our enemies, both foreign AND domestic... i.e. some in Congress.
Sincerely,
Captain James C Green
2250 S 3300 W
Heber City, UT 84032
Patriotic Constituionalist
